Paul Krugman: A Plea for a Return to Basics in Finance

Author of no less than twenty books, over 200 scholarly essays in peer-reviewed academic journals and more than 750 articles as a columnist, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman is not one to hide his mostly liberal opinions. As an economist, Mr Krugman repeatedly draws attention to the dangers of tinkering with established financial practices. He argues quite tirelessly against the exotic and highly complex financial instruments that entice investors and aim to create paper wealth.

Mr Krugman is a saltwater economist pur sang and vehemently defends a rather prominent role for the state in the conduct of macroeconomic affairs considering that it alone is able to avoid frightful booms and even more terrible busts. Still, Mr Krugman is no exponent of Keynesianism in economics. He has been heard to say that sweatshops are preferable to unemployment and has likened the opposition to unfettered free trade to denying the theory of evolution through natural selection.

In a word, Paul Krugman finds his own way. He has been particularly vociferous in his opposition to the untold billions spent in the US and Europe to bail out faltering banks. Mr Krugman thinks that money would have been better spent stimulating the wider economy. In fact, Mr Krugman finds that monetary conservatism by central bankers is apt to needlessly prolong economic crises. The continued focus on reducing budget deficits may even lead to a third depression that would leave “millions of lives blighted by the absence of jobs”.

Needless to say, Mr Krugman is not impressed by the US Federal Reserve’s drawing down its stimulus spending. In his Manifesto for Economic Sense, co-written by British labour economist Richard Layard, Mr Krugman argues that the major industrial economies of the world are mired in a liquidity trap since interest rates cannot be lowered any further in an attempt to jumpstart growth. Krugman and Layard propose deepening counter-cyclical government spending as an obvious way out of this trap.

What Mr Krugman mostly advocates though is a return to common sense economics and finance, considering that most deregulatory experiments have either failed or produced unforeseen, and often painful, side-effects. In today’s world, it’s rather innovative to plead for an end to financial innovation.

CFI

Recent Posts

The Pivot: Unlocking the Central African Republic’s Substantial Resource Frontier

The narrative of the Central African Republic (CAR) has long been confined to the periphery…

7 hours ago

From Penetration to Inclusion: How CRC Credit Bureau Is Re-Engineering Nigeria’s Credit Ecosystem

Nigeria’s journey towards broad-based financial inclusion has accelerated markedly in recent years, with credit penetration…

4 days ago

The Middle Power Dilemma: The UK and the Sovereignty Paradox in a Tri-Polar World

The hypothesis is simple. In a trade system increasingly shaped by the United States, China…

1 week ago

The Great Rebalancing: Capital Allocation in an Age of Fragmentation and Convergence

After a long stretch in which US markets served as the default setting for global…

2 weeks ago

The Dissonance of Davos 2026: Capital Allocation in an Age of Fragmentation and the AI–Energy Nexus

The World Economic Forum’s 56th Annual Meeting opened beneath the banner of “A Spirit of…

3 weeks ago

Leadership at the Helm of Kenya’s Renewable Power Champion

KenGen’s executive team brings together deep technical expertise, financial discipline, legal rigour and strategic foresight…

3 weeks ago